New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Faster compiling of charset regexpes #63528
Comments
Here is a patch which speed up compiling of regular expressions with big charsets. Microbenchmark: Unpatched (but with fixed bpo-19327): 119 msec per loop Compiling regular expressions with big charset was main cause of slowing down importing the email.message module (bpo-11454). |
Here is a more complex patch which optimizes charset compiling. It affects small charsets too. Big charsets now supports same optimizations as small charsets. Optimized bitmap now can be used even if the charset contains category items or non-bmp characters. $ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = '[0-9]+'" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 457 usec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 368 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = '[ \t\n\r\v\f]+'" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 490 usec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 413 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = '[0-9A-Za-z_]+'" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 760 usec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 527 usec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = r'[^\ud800-\udfff]*'" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 100 loops, best of 3: 2.07 msec per loop
Patched: 1000 loops, best of 3: 1.44 msec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = '[\u0410-\u042f\u0430-\u043f\u0404\u0406\u0407\u0454\u0456\u0457\u0490\u0491]+'" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 100 loops, best of 3: 8.24 msec per loop
Patched: 100 loops, best of 3: 2.13 msec per loop
$ ./python -m timeit "from sre_compile import compile; r = '[%s]' % ''.join(map(chr, range(256, 2**16, 255)))" "compile(r, 0)"
Unpatched: 10 loops, best of 3: 119 msec per loop
Patched: 10 loops, best of 3: 24.1 msec per loop |
Updated patch addresses Antoine's comments. One my bug fixed. |
New changeset d5498d9d9bb0 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'default': |
Thank you Antoine for your review. |
New changeset ebd48b4f650d by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7': |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: