New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CDLL does not use same paths as util.find_library #62702
Comments
CDLL does not use the same paths as find_library and thus you can *find* a library, but you can't necessarily use it. In my case, I had SDL2 in /usr/local/lib. find_library correctly gets Python 3.4.0a0 (default:5a6cdc0d7de1, Jul 18 2013, 17:55:27)
[GCC 4.7.3] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from ctypes import *
>>> import ctypes.util
>>> ctypes.util.find_library("SDL2")
'libSDL2-2.0.so.0'
>>> CDLL(_)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/steven/Programming/cpython/Lib/ctypes/__init__.py", line 351, in __init__
self._handle = _dlopen(self._name, mode)
OSError: libSDL2-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>> CDLL("/usr/local/lib/libSDL2.so")
<CDLL '/usr/local/lib/libSDL2.so', handle 22f89c0 at 7fc966da5ae8> |
On Linux gcc and ld are used to implement 'find_library' and 'dlopen' is used to implement 'CDLL'. ld searches /usr/local/lib. 'dlopen' might not if the LD_LIBRARY_PATH isn't set up to do so. For example: [meadori@li589-207 cpython]$ ls /usr/local/lib
libfoo.so libfoo.so.1 libfoo.so.1.0 linode
[meadori@li589-207 cpython]$ ./python
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:d6213012d87b, Jul 23 2013, 01:00:24)
[GCC 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from ctypes import *
>>> import ctypes.util
>>> ctypes.util.find_library('foo')
'libfoo.so.1'
>>> CDLL(_)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/home/meadori/src/cpython/Lib/ctypes/__init__.py", line 351, in __init__
self._handle = _dlopen(self._name, mode)OSError: libfoo.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
>>> quit()
[meadori@li589-207 cpython]$ echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
[meadori@li589-207 cpython]$ export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/lib
[meadori@li589-207 cpython]$ ./python
Python 3.4.0a0 (default:d6213012d87b, Jul 23 2013, 01:00:24)
[GCC 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2)] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> from ctypes import *
>>> import ctypes.util
>>> ctypes.util.find_library('foo')
'libfoo.so.1'
>>> CDLL(_)
<CDLL 'libfoo.so.1', handle 28e4b50 at 7f31e062b608> I am OK with this behavior in ctypes since it matches the system behavior with 'gcc' and 'dlopen'. So, I would fixup LD_LIBRARY_PATH or /etc/ld.so.conf if you want /usr/local/lib to be searched at load time. |
Should the docs then be changed for find_library to inform that "It is not guaranteed that a found library can be opened" (at least for linux)? Or would a feature request for full paths from find_library for linux be more appropriate? It seems hackish to me, if a program can find a library, but can't use it without asking the user to change some environment variables or testing /usr/local/lib. |
Documenting this quirk seems reasonable to me if you want to suggest a patch (and we don’t agree to fix it). See bpo-21042 for returning full paths on Linux. We tried to make this change, but it wasn’t easy to do it consistently for arbitrary ABIs, so I backed it out. See bpo-9998 discussing changing find_library() to emulate a run-time linker, rather than a compile-time linker. |
Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.
Show more details
GitHub fields:
bugs.python.org fields:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: