➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-08-26 21:58 by Yury.Selivanov, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| generators_return.patch | Yury.Selivanov, 2010-08-26 21:58 | |||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg115033 - (view) | Author: Yury Selivanov (Yury.Selivanov) * | Date: 2010-08-26 21:58 | |
The patch is intended to fix behaviour of 'return' statement in python's generators. Please read this message before looking at the patch. http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2010-August/103297.html |
|||
| msg115061 - (view) | Author: Amaury Forgeot d'Arc (amaury.forgeotdarc) *  |
Date: 2010-08-27 11:37 | |
Why is a run-time exception better than a SyntaxError in this case? And your patch now allows: x = None return x What's the rationale of this change? |
|||
| msg115336 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2010-09-01 21:42 | |
Uh, if I understand correctly, this is akin to what PEP 380 does with generator returns, just with a different exception. As such, if I'm not mistaken, it is a) a new language feature for after the moratorium and b) needs a competing PEP. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:05 | admin | set | github: 53904 |
| 2010-09-01 21:42:14 | georg.brandl | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + georg.brandl messages: + msg115336 resolution: rejected |
| 2010-08-27 11:37:07 | amaury.forgeotdarc | set | nosy:
+ amaury.forgeotdarc messages: + msg115061 |
| 2010-08-26 22:54:39 | eric.smith | set | nosy:
+ eric.smith |
| 2010-08-26 21:58:52 | Yury.Selivanov | create | |