➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2010-07-21 08:38 by techtonik, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg111020 - (view) | Author: anatoly techtonik (techtonik) | Date: 2010-07-21 08:38 | |
CGIHTTPServer looks for CGI files in '/htbin' directory. This never was a standard (in comparison to `cgi-bin`) and can be safely removed at least in Py3k |
|||
| msg111048 - (view) | Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) *  |
Date: 2010-07-21 13:14 | |
If it were to be removed it would have to go through the deprecation process. Does it cause any problems? If not I'd say we should just leave it. |
|||
| msg148052 - (view) | Author: Éric Araujo (eric.araujo) * |
Date: 2011-11-21 15:01 | |
Google does find matches for “CGI /htbin”. Given that CGI is an obsolete technology anyway, I don’t see value in removing that, and propose that we reject this request. |
|||
| msg264483 - (view) | Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2016-04-29 10:26 | |
I agree with David and Éric. There is no point to remove/deprecate it. I'd prefer to fix bugs in CGIHTTPRequestHandler (and in other CGI related stuff in stdlib) instead of introducing new incompatibilities at this point. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:04 | admin | set | github: 53567 |
| 2016-04-29 10:26:45 | berker.peksag | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + berker.peksag messages: + msg264483 resolution: rejected stage: resolved |
| 2011-11-21 15:01:36 | eric.araujo | set | nosy:
+ eric.araujo messages: + msg148052 versions: + Python 3.3, - Python 3.2 |
| 2010-07-21 13:14:03 | r.david.murray | set | versions:
- Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 2.7, Python 3.3 nosy: + r.david.murray messages: + msg111048 type: enhancement |
| 2010-07-21 08:38:00 | techtonik | create | |