Issue683061
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2003-02-08 19:52 by bescoto, last changed 2022-04-10 16:06 by admin. This issue is now closed.
Messages (8) | |||
---|---|---|---|
msg14515 - (view) | Author: Ben Escoto (bescoto) | Date: 2003-02-08 19:52 | |
Something like this: import gzip fin = open("/dev/urandom", "rb") fout = gzip.GzipFile("out", "wb") for i in range(4500): fout.write(fin.read(1024*1024)) fout.close() will result in an error like: Exception 'long int too large to convert to int' raised of class 'exceptions.OverflowError': ... File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/gzip.py", line 253, in close write32(self.fileobj, self.size) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.2/gzip.py", line 19, in write32 output.write(struct.pack("<l", value)) Tested in python 2.2.1 |
|||
msg14516 - (view) | Author: Steven Taschuk (staschuk) | Date: 2003-03-30 18:42 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=666873 Current CVS has a fix for this, as of revision 1.37 (part of 2.3a1). See patch 618135: http://www.python.org/sf/618135. |
|||
msg14517 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2003-05-29 01:20 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=357491 From what I can gather from cvs log this was not backported. Should it be? |
|||
msg14518 - (view) | Author: Michael Bartl (midramas) | Date: 2003-09-24 23:09 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=31511 I'd propose to close this bug (fixed in the 2.3 series). The fix can't be backported, because 2.2.3 was the final version of the 2.2 series. |
|||
msg14519 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) * ![]() |
Date: 2003-09-24 23:36 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=357491 No one ever said 2.2.3 was the final release of the 2.2 branch. There was talk just last month about a 2.2.4 release towards the end of the year. |
|||
msg14520 - (view) | Author: Michael Bartl (midramas) | Date: 2003-09-25 08:53 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=31511 Sorry for the error in my last comment: a backport can still be done for 2.2.4 or later. It seems the "final" confused me. I found it out some minutes after I wrote the comment. As the error is still present in 2.2.3, I will provide a patch that backports it (you can then vote for it <wink> :) |
|||
msg14521 - (view) | Author: Mark Eichin (eichin) | Date: 2004-11-27 23:00 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=79734 It's been a year - can we assume, with 2.4rc1 out, that there really won't be a 2.2.4 to put a backport into, and close this? |
|||
msg14522 - (view) | Author: Johannes Gijsbers (jlgijsbers) * ![]() |
Date: 2004-11-27 23:15 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=469548 Yes, I think it can. |
History | |||
---|---|---|---|
Date | User | Action | Args |
2022-04-10 16:06:38 | admin | set | github: 37939 |
2003-02-08 19:52:33 | bescoto | create |