➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2002-11-25 14:06 by jvr, last changed 2022-04-10 16:05 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| dict.update.patch | jvr, 2002-11-25 14:06 | allow keyword args in dict.update() | ||
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg41767 - (view) | Author: Just van Rossum (jvr) *  |
Date: 2002-11-25 14:06 | |
Now that patch #642500 is in, it only seems logical to also allow keyword args in dict.update(). This patch simply reuses dict_init(), so d.update(seq_of_items) also works. I'm not conviced of the neccessity of this patch, but the implementation is very simple. Doc and test will follow (also: gladly accepted ;-) if the idea is accepted. Side effect: d.update() (no args!) raises no exception anymore. |
|||
| msg41768 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) *  |
Date: 2002-11-27 20:58 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=21627 What documentation and test suite changes do you propose? |
|||
| msg41769 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2002-12-29 05:24 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=80475 This would be a nice idea for completeness but it is neither necessary nor desirable. d[k]=v is a faster, clearer, one- way-to-do-it alternative. The side-effect is also undesirable. I'm -0 on this one. |
|||
| msg41770 - (view) | Author: Just van Rossum (jvr) * |
Date: 2002-12-29 09:01 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=92689 I'd completely forgotten about this patch. I has little use indeed. Closed & Rejected. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:05:56 | admin | set | github: 37532 |
| 2002-11-25 14:06:08 | jvr | create | |