➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2022-03-05 10:41 by ronaldoussoren, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg414574 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) *  |
Date: 2022-03-05 10:41 | |
In a static type when the "tp_name" is set to a fully qualified name (such as "my.package.TypeName") the "__qualname__" returns the unqualified name ("TypeName") instead of the fully qualified name.
The type's ``__name__`` and ``__module__`` have the expected value.
This is IMHO a bug in the implementation of type_qualname in Objects/typeobject.c.
Note that setting ``__qualname__`` in the types's ``__dict__`` doesn't work, that value is ignored.
|
|||
| msg414588 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2022-03-05 17:05 | |
What do you expect? The full qualified name of the object is __module__ + '.' + __qualname__. |
|||
| msg414594 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2022-03-05 19:56 | |
You're right. I was sure that __qualname__ included the module name, but PEP 3155 is clear about actual semantics. Sorry about the noise. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:57 | admin | set | github: 91084 |
| 2022-03-05 19:56:22 | ronaldoussoren | set | status: open -> closed resolution: not a bug messages: + msg414594 stage: test needed -> resolved |
| 2022-03-05 17:05:27 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka messages: + msg414588 |
| 2022-03-05 10:41:07 | ronaldoussoren | create | |