➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2021-10-28 00:05 by skip.montanaro, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg405141 - (view) | Author: Skip Montanaro (skip.montanaro) *  |
Date: 2021-10-28 00:05 | |
At the top of Tools/ccbench/ccbench.py is this comment dating from 2010 (probably in the initial version): # This file should be kept compatible with both Python 2.6 and Python >= 3.0. Is there still a need for 2.6 compatibility in what is essentially a test script? There are probably only a few changes necessary to remove 2.x compatibility, but it seems odd to retain them when even the Python library documentation no longer has versionchanged/versionadded directives referencing Python 2.x. |
|||
| msg405485 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) *  |
Date: 2021-11-02 03:59 | |
Lukasz, is 'delete it' the no-brainer it seems to be? |
|||
| msg405508 - (view) | Author: Skip Montanaro (skip.montanaro) * |
Date: 2021-11-02 12:34 | |
CCbench was mentioned recently in the discussion about Sam Gross's nogil branch: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/WRT7F2RHHCQ3N2TYEDC6JSIJ4T2ZM6F7/ I'm not convinced that deleting it is a no-brainer. Maybe if it landed somewhere generally useful (pyperformance?). |
|||
| msg405515 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * |
Date: 2021-11-02 16:06 | |
By 'it' I meant the comment and 2.6 compatibility you asked about. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:51 | admin | set | github: 89801 |
| 2021-11-02 16:06:26 | terry.reedy | set | messages: + msg405515 |
| 2021-11-02 12:34:58 | skip.montanaro | set | messages: + msg405508 |
| 2021-11-02 03:59:14 | terry.reedy | set | nosy:
+ terry.reedy, lukasz.langa messages: + msg405485 |
| 2021-10-28 00:05:44 | skip.montanaro | create | |