➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2021-08-26 15:25 by iritkatriel, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 28246 | merged | iritkatriel, 2021-09-08 22:19 | |
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg400355 - (view) | Author: Irit Katriel (iritkatriel) *  |
Date: 2021-08-26 15:25 | |
The modulefinder library module has logic that understands particular opcodes (such as the scan_opcodes method). This should be encapsulated in the dis module, and modulefinder should not process opcodes directly. |
|||
| msg401445 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2021-09-09 08:39 | |
What is wrong with this? Is such logic used in the dis module or any other module outside modulefinder? |
|||
| msg401446 - (view) | Author: Irit Katriel (iritkatriel) * |
Date: 2021-09-09 08:55 | |
The modulefinder module shouldn’t know what sequence of opcodes the compiler emits for import. For example, if the compiler changes you get a fairly high level test failure that you need to debug. After this refactor the test failure is more obviously pointing to what changed. |
|||
| msg401460 - (view) | Author: Batuhan Taskaya (BTaskaya) * |
Date: 2021-09-09 10:30 | |
Does find_imports/find_store_names have to be public? I think the relocation is fine, but making them public without any use case from outside can be avoided at least for now. |
|||
| msg401463 - (view) | Author: Irit Katriel (iritkatriel) * |
Date: 2021-09-09 11:03 | |
I agree, I’ll make them private. |
|||
| msg401469 - (view) | Author: Irit Katriel (iritkatriel) * |
Date: 2021-09-09 13:04 | |
New changeset 04676b69466d2e6d2903f1c6879d2cb292721455 by Irit Katriel in branch 'main': bpo-45017: move opcode-related logic from modulefinder to dis (GH-28246) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/04676b69466d2e6d2903f1c6879d2cb292721455 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:49 | admin | set | github: 89180 |
| 2021-09-09 13:05:31 | iritkatriel | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2021-09-09 13:04:20 | iritkatriel | set | messages: + msg401469 |
| 2021-09-09 11:03:32 | iritkatriel | set | messages: + msg401463 |
| 2021-09-09 10:30:50 | BTaskaya | set | nosy:
+ BTaskaya messages: + msg401460 |
| 2021-09-09 08:55:06 | iritkatriel | set | messages: + msg401446 |
| 2021-09-09 08:39:49 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka messages: + msg401445 |
| 2021-09-08 22:19:48 | iritkatriel | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request26666 |
| 2021-08-26 15:28:19 | gvanrossum | set | nosy:
+ gvanrossum |
| 2021-08-26 15:25:23 | iritkatriel | create | |