➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2021-07-18 21:27 by kwutge, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| abc.png | kwutge, 2021-07-18 21:27 | |||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg397759 - (view) | Author: Toby Spooner (kwutge) | Date: 2021-07-18 21:27 | |
def func(a,b,c , *args , **kwargs):
print(a)
print(args)
print(kwargs)
func(2,3,4,5,Carlson=240,Shehroz="maladiss")
# print(args) showing (5,). NEED TO FIX. python 3.9.6
|
|||
| msg397762 - (view) | Author: Dennis Sweeney (Dennis Sweeney) *  |
Date: 2021-07-18 21:36 | |
I don't know what behavior you were expecting, but *args means "the rest of the positional arguments", not "all of the positional arguments." See https://docs.python.org/3/tutorial/controlflow.html?highlight=variadic#arbitrary-argument-lists |
|||
| msg397763 - (view) | Author: Zachary Ware (zach.ware) * |
Date: 2021-07-18 23:03 | |
As Dennis said, this isn't a bug. Try printing `b` and `c` as well, and you'll find 3 and 4. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:47 | admin | set | github: 88836 |
| 2021-07-18 23:03:16 | zach.ware | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + zach.ware messages: + msg397763 resolution: not a bug stage: resolved |
| 2021-07-18 21:36:41 | Dennis Sweeney | set | nosy:
+ Dennis Sweeney messages: + msg397762 |
| 2021-07-18 21:27:05 | kwutge | create | |