This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: Include regen-stdlib-module-names in regen-all
Type: enhancement Stage: resolved
Components: Build Versions:
process
Status: closed Resolution: rejected
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: Nosy List: andrei.avk, nascheme
Priority: normal Keywords: patch

Created on 2021-03-03 07:08 by nascheme, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Pull Requests
URL Status Linked Edit
PR 24713 closed nascheme, 2021-03-03 07:08
Messages (2)
msg388003 - (view) Author: Neil Schemenauer (nascheme) * (Python committer) Date: 2021-03-03 07:08
While I was fixing the regen-frozen issue, I noticed it seems unnecessary to have regen-stdlib-module-names separate from regen-all.  Maybe Victor knows why it needs to be separate.  If it doesn't need to be separate, the CI scripts can be slightly simplified.
msg397002 - (view) Author: Andrei Kulakov (andrei.avk) * (Python triager) Date: 2021-07-05 16:01
This can be closed based on PR comment by nascheme.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:59:42adminsetgithub: 87550
2021-07-05 19:07:34naschemesetstatus: open -> closed
resolution: rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
2021-07-05 16:01:18andrei.avksetnosy: + andrei.avk
messages: + msg397002
2021-03-03 07:08:35naschemesetkeywords: + patch
pull_requests: + pull_request23494
2021-03-03 07:08:09naschemecreate