Add a synchronized primitive Barrier in asyncio, in order to be consistent with them we have for threading.

Barrier object will have a similar design from that of threading lib.
(May be we have to think about a backport ?)


Initial discussion started here: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/IAFAH7PWMUDUTLXYLNSXES7VMDQ26A3W/

An update was submitted on PR.

Modified python files are:

   file lib/asyncio/locks.py
   file lib/test/test_asyncio/test_locks.py

And related documentation files

   file Doc/library/asyncio-api-index.rst
   file Doc/library/asyncio-sync.rst

Please, could you have a look ?

This last version includes the propositions, remarks from @asveltov and @eamanu

This PR is always stuck, so could you please approve the 3 running workflows ?

New changeset d03acd7270d66ddb8e987f9743405147ecc15087 by Duprat in branch 'main':
bpo-43352: Add a Barrier object in asyncio lib (GH-24903)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/d03acd7270d66ddb8e987f9743405147ecc15087