➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-08-24 19:45 by steve.dower, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 22098 | merged | steve.dower, 2020-09-04 20:37 | |
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg375860 - (view) | Author: Steve Dower (steve.dower) *  |
Date: 2020-08-24 19:45 | |
Currently, the user site packages on Windows is %APPDATA%\Python\PythonXY. This can cause conflicts between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the runtime.
We should switch the pattern to Python{sys.winver}, which is XY or XY-32, the same as elsewhere.
This is a breaking change to tools that try to manage these directly, but it shouldn't need a deprecation cycle (there isn't really anywhere to raise a warning...). So I think we can just update Lib/sysconfig.py and Lib/site.py for 3.10, as well as the docs.
|
|||
| msg376085 - (view) | Author: Terry J. Reedy (terry.reedy) * |
Date: 2020-08-29 22:24 | |
If it is otherwise possible to user-only install both 32 and 64 bit versions, then using the same site-packages strikes me a bug, even if only fixed in the next version. |
|||
| msg376142 - (view) | Author: Dong-hee Na (corona10) * |
Date: 2020-08-31 08:40 | |
> We should switch the pattern to Python{sys.winver}, which is XY or XY-32, the same as elsewhere.
+1
|
|||
| msg376401 - (view) | Author: Steve Dower (steve.dower) * |
Date: 2020-09-04 20:41 | |
> If it is otherwise possible to user-only install both 32 and 64 bit versions, then using the same site-packages strikes me a bug It's very easy to install both 32 and 64-bit runtimes (and it doesn't matter if they're user or system installs). But when you're installing packages in the nt_user scheme (--user with pip), you can only use one or the other. If you install with 32-bit runtime first, then you'll get 32-bit binaries installed and the 64-bit runtime won't try and install the package again (or it'll delete it and replace it with one that only works with the 64-bit runtime). With the change in PR 22098, the 32-bit interpreter will install to a different location. |
|||
| msg376418 - (view) | Author: Steve Dower (steve.dower) * |
Date: 2020-09-04 23:46 | |
New changeset dd18001c308fb3bb65006c91d95f6639583a3420 by Steve Dower in branch 'master': bpo-41627: Distinguish 32 and 64-bit user site packages on Windows (GH-22098) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dd18001c308fb3bb65006c91d95f6639583a3420 |
|||
| msg376419 - (view) | Author: Steve Dower (steve.dower) * |
Date: 2020-09-04 23:46 | |
> With the change in PR 22098, the 32-bit interpreter will install to a different location. To clarify this, I meant the 32-bit interpreter will install *packages* to a different location (when using the user scheme). |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:35 | admin | set | github: 85793 |
| 2021-02-11 03:58:20 | eryksun | link | issue43195 superseder |
| 2020-09-04 23:46:47 | steve.dower | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg376419 assignee: steve.dower resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2020-09-04 23:46:00 | steve.dower | set | messages: + msg376418 |
| 2020-09-04 20:41:03 | steve.dower | set | messages: + msg376401 |
| 2020-09-04 20:37:26 | steve.dower | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request21185 |
| 2020-08-31 08:40:38 | corona10 | set | nosy:
+ corona10 messages: + msg376142 |
| 2020-08-29 22:24:29 | terry.reedy | set | nosy:
+ terry.reedy messages: + msg376085 |
| 2020-08-24 19:45:31 | steve.dower | create | |