➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-06-02 23:11 by Rainald Koch, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg370637 - (view) | Author: Rainald Koch (Rainald Koch) | Date: 2020-06-02 23:11 | |
In section [10] of the FAQ, I whould add "(a function parameter with different default values)" after "variables local to the lambdas". Besides, I had to look up "memoizing" [2] and suspect that "memorizing" would be correct. [10] https://docs.python.org/3/faq/programming.html#why-do-lambdas-defined-in-a-loop-with-different-values-all-return-the-same-result [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memoization |
|||
| msg370640 - (view) | Author: SilentGhost (SilentGhost) *  |
Date: 2020-06-03 05:24 | |
I don't think your suggestion improve readability there. I think explanation following the code example does a decent job without being overly verbose. Regarding, memoization, it is mentioned in [0], right after describing the technique. So, I'm not sure why you had to specifically look it up or why you still suspect that memorisation would be correct [0]: https://docs.python.org/3/faq/programming.html#why-are-default-values-shared-between-objects |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:31 | admin | set | github: 85027 |
| 2020-06-03 16:50:00 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed resolution: rejected stage: resolved |
| 2020-06-03 05:24:02 | SilentGhost | set | nosy:
+ SilentGhost messages: + msg370640 |
| 2020-06-02 23:11:05 | Rainald Koch | create | |