➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2001-03-13 21:04 by robin900, last changed 2022-04-10 16:03 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| slicediff | robin900, 2001-03-13 21:04 | |||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg36048 - (view) | Author: Robin Thomas (robin900) | Date: 2001-03-13 21:04 | |
This patch changes the behavior of slice objects in the following manner: - Slice objects are now comparable with other slice objects as though they were logically tuples of (start,stop,step). The tuple is not created in the comparison function, but the comparison behavior is logically equivalent. - Slice objects are not hashable. With the above change to being comparable, slice objects now cannot be used as keys in dictionaries. I ask that this patch be considered a "bug fix", rather than a change in functionality, and thus be included in 2.1b2 and forward. Other proposed changes to slicing and slice objects have been postponed until further discussion and the requisite PEP submission. |
|||
| msg36049 - (view) | Author: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum) *  |
Date: 2001-03-20 12:42 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=6380 Fix applied. Thanks! (Isn't there a corresponding bug report that should be closed?) |
|||
| msg36050 - (view) | Author: Robin Thomas (robin900) | Date: 2001-03-20 16:09 | |
Logged In: YES user_id=127529 The "bug report" was just a post to the Python list. I'm not aware of a SourceFroge bug issue (although there might be). |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-10 16:03:51 | admin | set | github: 34146 |
| 2001-03-13 21:04:00 | robin900 | create | |