➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2020-04-29 08:27 by amaajemyfren, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 19787 | closed | amaajemyfren, 2020-04-29 08:32 | |
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg367633 - (view) | Author: Ama Aje My Fren (amaajemyfren) * | Date: 2020-04-29 08:27 | |
The design and history FAQ (https://docs.python.org/dev/faq/design.html#why-isn-t-there-a-switch-or-case-statement-in-python) explains why there is no case statement referencing PEP 275(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0275/). For Python 3 there is, however, PEP 3103(https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3103/) which rejected the proposal for a switch statement. |
|||
| msg367710 - (view) | Author: Joannah Nanjekye (nanjekyejoannah) *  |
Date: 2020-04-29 22:33 | |
What is your reasoning on referencing just one of the PEPs and not both of them? |
|||
| msg367838 - (view) | Author: Ama Aje My Fren (amaajemyfren) * | Date: 2020-05-01 12:26 | |
the statement initially said that there was _no consensus yet on how to do range tests_. This is not true because there is now a decision to not do range tests - that decision is only in PEP 3103 and not in PEP 275 (PEP 275 actually links to PEP 3103 to explain why it is rejected). My feeling is that putting two references complicates the goal of explaining it. |
|||
| msg367865 - (view) | Author: Joannah Nanjekye (nanjekyejoannah) * |
Date: 2020-05-01 17:23 | |
> PEP 275 actually links to PEP 3103 to explain why it is rejected Well, am not very convinced if consensus was reached on range tests so I will refrain for someone else's opinion as it is not as apparent to me yet. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:30 | admin | set | github: 84614 |
| 2020-05-01 17:23:06 | nanjekyejoannah | set | messages: + msg367865 |
| 2020-05-01 12:26:40 | amaajemyfren | set | messages: + msg367838 |
| 2020-04-29 22:33:04 | nanjekyejoannah | set | nosy:
+ nanjekyejoannah messages: + msg367710 |
| 2020-04-29 08:33:46 | amaajemyfren | set | type: enhancement |
| 2020-04-29 08:32:18 | amaajemyfren | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request19110 |
| 2020-04-29 08:27:47 | amaajemyfren | create | |