The regular expression used for matching numbers in the documentation for the regular expressions module (the tokenizer section) doesn't match the string ".5", but does match the string "3.".

Here's a link to the tokenizer section of the documentation: https://docs.python.org/3/library/re.html#writing-a-tokenizer

The tokenizer example uses r'\d+(\.\d*)?' for matching numbers. I would personally match ".5" as a number before I would match "3." as a number. In order to do this, I would use r'(\d*\.)?\d+' instead of r'\d+(\.\d*)?'. Python 3's interpreter matches both "3." and ".5" as numbers when interpreting code, so you could use a different regex example for matching both if you wanted to be consistent with Python's own interpreter.

As you say, isn't this just a personal preference?

Is there an objective reason to prefer something that accepts ".5" and rejects "3." over something that rejects ".5" and accepts "3."?

The exact form of numbers accepted seems to be to be irrelevant to the point of the example; I'm not sure I see much value in changing it.

I concur with Mark. It is just an example. The regular expression which would support all possible forms of numbers (including exponent, underscores, non-decimal numbers) would be more complex and would distract from the main goal of the example.