➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2019-11-06 05:08 by benjamin.peterson, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 17070 | merged | benjamin.peterson, 2019-11-06 05:12 | |
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg356091 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) *  |
Date: 2019-11-06 05:08 | |
Add signal.pidfd_send_signal, which will wrap the Linux 5.1 syscall of the same name. |
|||
| msg356093 - (view) | Author: Nathaniel Smith (njs) * |
Date: 2019-11-06 05:31 | |
I guess a bikeshed question is whether it should be `os.pidfd_send_signal` (like `os.kill`) or `signal.pidfd_send_signal` (like `signal.pthread_kill`). I don't actually care either way myself :-) |
|||
| msg356101 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * |
Date: 2019-11-06 06:42 | |
Yes, I thought about that a bit. I choose signal because: 1. signal already has some specialized functions that send signals pthread_kill and raise_signal. 2. If we every do want to implement the third parameter of pidfd_send_signal, the signal module already defines a siginfo structseq. 3. (least convincing) os/posix has way too much stuff. I generally think that we should strive to find a good home for new OS-level functionality that isn't the os module. |
|||
| msg357028 - (view) | Author: Benjamin Peterson (benjamin.peterson) * |
Date: 2019-11-20 04:39 | |
New changeset 7483451577916e693af6d20cf520b2cc7e2174d2 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'master': closes bpo-38712: Add signal.pidfd_send_signal. (GH-17070) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/7483451577916e693af6d20cf520b2cc7e2174d2 |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:22 | admin | set | github: 82893 |
| 2019-11-20 04:39:20 | benjamin.peterson | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed messages: + msg357028 stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2019-11-06 06:42:46 | benjamin.peterson | set | messages: + msg356101 |
| 2019-11-06 05:31:25 | njs | set | messages: + msg356093 |
| 2019-11-06 05:12:25 | benjamin.peterson | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request16579 |
| 2019-11-06 05:10:42 | benjamin.peterson | set | nosy:
+ njs |
| 2019-11-06 05:08:46 | benjamin.peterson | create | |