Title: Ambiguous signature for builtins.__build_class__
Type: Stage: resolved
Components: Documentation Versions:
Status: closed Resolution: fixed
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: docs@python Nosy List: BTaskaya, bup, docs@python, pablogsal
Priority: normal Keywords: patch

Created on 2019-10-11 11:29 by bup, last changed 2019-11-24 16:22 by pablogsal. This issue is now closed.

Pull Requests
URL Status Linked Edit
PR 16735 merged pablogsal, 2019-10-12 20:17
Messages (3)
msg354442 - (view) Author: Dan Snider (bup) * Date: 2019-10-11 11:29
The function has the following signature documented:

    __build_class__(func, name, *bases, metaclass=None, **kwds) 

This implies that `func` and `name` are not positional only parameters when in fact, they are. Another problem with that signature is that None is not a valid value for the metaclass parameter.
msg356730 - (view) Author: Batuhan Taskaya (BTaskaya) * (Python committer) Date: 2019-11-15 23:52
This issue is fixed with PR 16735, @pablogsal can we close it?
msg356934 - (view) Author: Pablo Galindo Salgado (pablogsal) * (Python committer) Date: 2019-11-18 23:43
>  @pablogsal can we close it?

Yup, thanks for the ping, Batuhan
Date User Action Args
2019-11-24 16:22:20pablogsalsetstatus: open -> closed
resolution: fixed
stage: patch review -> resolved
2019-11-18 23:43:40pablogsalsetmessages: + msg356934
2019-11-15 23:52:36BTaskayasetnosy: + pablogsal, BTaskaya
messages: + msg356730
2019-10-12 20:17:35pablogsalsetkeywords: + patch
stage: patch review
pull_requests: + pull_request16314
2019-10-11 18:25:13levkivskyisetassignee: docs@python

components: + Documentation
nosy: + docs@python
2019-10-11 11:29:11bupcreate