As discussed in the thread starting here with Guido's message:

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WTBXYJJ7CSGDLLJHHPHSH5ZCCA4C7QEP/

and these two follow-ups:

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/SXF3RKYQ6DXFKX2RFMUDUKAWQEGXGHP3/

https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VRCH56CHE4P7IAWO7QRA6TDBISLONGQT/


we should do a better job of advertising typing.NamedTuple by aliasing it in the collections module.

(I'm not sure if this can still go into 3.8, since it's not really a new feature, or if its too late.)

> we should do a better job of advertising typing.NamedTuple

FWIW, I had updated the docs for namedtuple() to link to typing.NamedTuple.  I think that should suffice.

> FWIW, I had updated the docs for namedtuple() to link to typing.NamedTuple.  I think that should suffice.

Thank you!  I looked at the docs everything looks good.  I think this can be closed now.

Further notes for posterity:

* Anything written using collections.NamedTuple would instantly lose its backwards compatibility.  

* The casing of NamedTuple is more in line with the typing module:  List, Deque, NamedTuple and doesn't fit well with the deque, namedtuple, and ChainMap in the collections module. 

* Nothing in the collections module currently requires typing, but NamedTuple can only be used with typing.  

* We really don't want to increase import times for collections. This proposal would defeat the entire purpose of having moved _collections_abc to a separate module outside of the collections package.