➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2019-06-06 22:16 by nlevitt, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin.
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg344880 - (view) | Author: Noah (nlevitt) | Date: 2019-06-06 22:16 | |
Suggesting option to raise exception if process exits nonzero in `with subprocess.Popen(...):`
with subprocess.Popen('/bin/false'):
pass
I made the mistake of assuming this construct would raise an exception (CalledProcessError). It would be nice if there were a way to do that.
|
|||
| msg344882 - (view) | Author: Eric V. Smith (eric.smith) *  |
Date: 2019-06-06 22:25 | |
I think Popen() is just about as complex as anyone wants it to be. Is there something about .run() or .check_call() that keeps you from using them? |
|||
| msg344883 - (view) | Author: Noah (nlevitt) | Date: 2019-06-06 22:32 | |
Yes, I'm piping a large amount of data to/from a fairly long-running subprocess. |
|||
| msg344886 - (view) | Author: Eric V. Smith (eric.smith) * |
Date: 2019-06-06 23:17 | |
I figured as much (but didn't want to lead the witness!). I'm not completely opposed to this. I think the best thing to do is to bring up the proposal on python-ideas, and point here. |
|||
| msg345257 - (view) | Author: Noah (nlevitt) | Date: 2019-06-11 18:03 | |
I subscribed and emailed python-ideas@python.org but it still hasn't passed moderation I guess, hmm |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:16 | admin | set | github: 81365 |
| 2019-06-11 18:03:12 | nlevitt | set | messages: + msg345257 |
| 2019-06-07 01:24:14 | xtreak | set | nosy:
+ gregory.p.smith |
| 2019-06-06 23:17:14 | eric.smith | set | messages: + msg344886 |
| 2019-06-06 22:32:17 | nlevitt | set | messages: + msg344883 |
| 2019-06-06 22:25:51 | eric.smith | set | nosy:
+ eric.smith messages: + msg344882 versions: + Python 3.9 |
| 2019-06-06 22:16:29 | nlevitt | create | |