➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2019-05-05 19:15 by asvetlov, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 13101 | merged | asvetlov, 2019-05-05 20:16 | |
| Messages (1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg341472 - (view) | Author: Andrew Svetlov (asvetlov) *  |
Date: 2019-05-05 19:15 | |
They were intended to be used by asyncio factories like open_connection from the very beginning but internals was leaked into asyncio top-level namespace. The idea is: 1. provide `_asyncio_internal` keyword-only parameter to leaked classes constructor 2. have it False by default 3. Use `_asyncio_internal=True` when called from asyncio code. 3. Raise DeprecationWarning if `_asyncio_internal` is False |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:14 | admin | set | github: 80987 |
| 2019-05-07 02:54:08 | asvetlov | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2019-05-05 20:16:23 | asvetlov | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request13014 |
| 2019-05-05 19:15:37 | asvetlov | create | |