https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/urllib/parse.py#L875
It's redundant to raise and then catch exception.

Code in question:

try:
    # non-sequence items should not work with len()
    # non-empty strings will fail this
    if len(query) and not isinstance(query[0], tuple):
        raise TypeError
    # [. . .]
except TypeError:
    ty, va, tb = sys.exc_info()
    raise TypeError("not a valid non-string sequence "
                    "or mapping object").with_traceback(tb)

It is not redundant if you want a specific error message. I think that is the point of the code, to indicate the problem to the programmer. So the message is meant to be useful. I can think of three cases:

>>> urlencode(None)  # Non-sequence
TypeError: not a valid non-string sequence or mapping object
>>> urlencode({'sized but not indexable'})
TypeError: not a valid non-string sequence or mapping object
>>> urlencode('item [0] not a tuple')
TypeError: not a valid non-string sequence or mapping object

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/master/Lib/urllib/parse.py#L875
It's redundant to raise and then catch exception.

I mean:
if len(query) and not isinstance(query[0], tuple):
    ty, va, tb = sys.exc_info()
    raise TypeError("not a valid non-string sequence "
                    "or mapping object").with_traceback(tb)


Would be more clean.

That would not include the custom error message for the first two cases I listed. I suggest closing this.

I concur with Martin. The try-except block was added for purpose.