➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2018-12-09 09:33 by midnio, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg331420 - (view) | Author: Muhammed Alkan (midnio) | Date: 2018-12-09 09:33 | |
I see nothing wrong with adding Tail Call Optimization to Python. |
|||
| msg331422 - (view) | Author: Steven D'Aprano (steven.daprano) *  |
Date: 2018-12-09 10:35 | |
> I see nothing wrong with adding Tail Call Optimization to Python. That's nice. Is that supposed to be an argument that convinces us? You are hardly the first person ever to suggest TCO for Python: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tail+call+optimization+site%3Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fmail.python.org Unless you have a more convincing argument than the arguments previously made, and rejected, this ticket will be closed. Even though this has been rejected in the past, the door is not quite closed. In a couple of weeks, Guido will be replaced as BDFL, and the new governor(s) may be more receptive to this idea. But you will probably need to write a PEP. |
|||
| msg331423 - (view) | Author: Karthikeyan Singaravelan (xtreak) * |
Date: 2018-12-09 10:42 | |
Guido had some thoughts on Tail Recursion Optimization (TRE). http://neopythonic.blogspot.com/2009/04/tail-recursion-elimination.html |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:09 | admin | set | github: 79624 |
| 2018-12-09 11:47:33 | midnio | set | status: open -> closed stage: resolved |
| 2018-12-09 10:42:59 | xtreak | set | nosy:
+ xtreak messages: + msg331423 |
| 2018-12-09 10:35:01 | steven.daprano | set | nosy:
+ steven.daprano messages: + msg331422 |
| 2018-12-09 09:33:16 | midnio | create | |