On Python 3.7.0 lib2to3 will not parse code like this:

    def foo(print=None):
      pass

and yield the following error instead

    lib2to3.pgen2.parse.ParseError: bad input: type=1, value='print', context=('', (1, 8))

In 2.x, 'print' is a reserved keyword and compiling foo fails with SyntaxError.  AFAIK, 2to3 expects the input to be *valid* 2.x code that compiles.  So it seems to me that the bug is in the input, not 2to3, and that this issue should be closed as 'not a bug'.

Previous related reports:

* Issue 35260: “2to3” doesn’t parse Python 3’s “print” function by default because it is supposed to translate Python 2 syntax
* Issue 2412: “2to3” should support “from __future__ import print_function”. That frees up the “print” reserved keyword in Python 2.6+.

I disagree that this is "not a bug". While conversion from 2 to 3 is 2to3's main intention, the documentation advertises:

2to3 supporting library lib2to3 is, however, a flexible and generic library, so it is possible to write your own fixers for 2to3. lib2to3 could also be adapted to custom applications in which Python code needs to be edited automatically.
(https://docs.python.org/3.5/library/2to3.html#module-lib2to3)

And it is used for other purposes. See
- this sphinx bug: https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/1641
- bower: https://pybowler.io/docs/basics-refactoring

Also `print("a", file=sys.stderr)` *is* valid python2 provided that `print_function` is imported.