➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2018-07-09 15:57 by adelfino, last changed 2022-04-11 14:59 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 8203 | closed | adelfino, 2018-07-09 16:05 | |
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg321327 - (view) | Author: Andrés Delfino (adelfino) *  |
Date: 2018-07-09 15:57 | |
I've been bitten by this one, and while the docs are clear in what the created mock objects support, I think something explicit about __iter__ will help. |
|||
| msg321333 - (view) | Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) *  |
Date: 2018-07-09 16:18 | |
-1. We can't document every non-existent feature in the stdlib documentation. There is an already open issue for adding __iter__ support to mock_open(): Issue 21258 |
|||
| msg321335 - (view) | Author: Berker Peksag (berker.peksag) * |
Date: 2018-07-09 16:33 | |
There is also bpo-32933. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:59:02 | admin | set | github: 78258 |
| 2018-07-09 16:33:31 | berker.peksag | set | messages: + msg321335 |
| 2018-07-09 16:18:04 | berker.peksag | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + berker.peksag messages: + msg321333 resolution: rejected stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2018-07-09 16:05:28 | adelfino | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request7753 |
| 2018-07-09 15:57:57 | adelfino | create | |