Created on 2018-03-28 09:05 by ncoghlan, last changed 2019-12-27 14:15 by evandrocoan. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 7424 | merged | vinay.sajip, 2018-06-05 11:52 | |
| PR 17714 | open | evandrocoan, 2019-12-27 14:15 | |
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg314578 - (view) | Author: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) *  |
Date: 2018-03-28 09:05 | |
warnings.warn() offers a stacklevel parameter to make it easier to write helper functions that generate warnings - by passing "stacklevel=2", you can ensure the warning is attributed to the caller of the helper function, rather than to the helper function itself. There isn't currently a similarly clear way to write helper functions that emit logging messages - if the format includes "pathname", "filename", "module", "function", or "lineno", then those will always report the location of the helper function, rather than the caller of the helper function. It would be convenient if logging.debug() et al accepted a "stacklevel" parameter the same way the warnings module does (although this may require some adjustments to the Logger.findCaller method API) |
|||
| msg318764 - (view) | Author: Vinay Sajip (vinay.sajip) * |
Date: 2018-06-05 16:24 | |
New changeset dde9fdbe453925279ac3d2a6a72102f6f9ef247c by Vinay Sajip in branch 'master': bpo-33165: Added stacklevel parameter to logging APIs. (GH-7424) https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dde9fdbe453925279ac3d2a6a72102f6f9ef247c |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-12-27 14:15:12 | evandrocoan | set | pull_requests: + pull_request17159 |
| 2018-06-05 16:26:27 | vinay.sajip | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2018-06-05 16:24:20 | vinay.sajip | set | messages: + msg318764 |
| 2018-06-05 11:52:39 | vinay.sajip | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: needs patch -> patch review pull_requests: + pull_request7049 |
| 2018-03-28 09:05:21 | ncoghlan | create | |