➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2018-03-27 11:22 by madsjensen, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 5799 | madsjensen, 2018-03-27 17:15 | ||
| Messages (3) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg314517 - (view) | Author: Mads Jensen (madsjensen) * | Date: 2018-03-27 11:22 | |
There are lots of legacy calls in the form of ClassName.method, which should be replaced with super().method. This is an issue in many modules; I've been asked to create a report for each module that the PR touches. |
|||
| msg321475 - (view) | Author: Vinay Sajip (vinay.sajip) *  |
Date: 2018-07-11 15:06 | |
See the comments on bpo-31853. I agree with the consensus there that these changes aren't worth doing: msg314518 msg314520 msg314521 So, I propose to close this as "not a bug" which in this context means "not an enhancement that's worth doing". |
|||
| msg321488 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2018-07-11 17:06 | |
I agree that this shouldn't be done for logging and that likely it shouldn't be done for most modules. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:59 | admin | set | github: 77336 |
| 2018-07-11 17:06:36 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + rhettinger messages: + msg321488 resolution: rejected stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2018-07-11 15:06:04 | vinay.sajip | set | messages: + msg321475 |
| 2018-03-27 19:29:07 | rhettinger | set | assignee: vinay.sajip |
| 2018-03-27 17:15:12 | madsjensen | set | keywords:
+ patch stage: patch review pull_requests: + pull_request5999 |
| 2018-03-27 11:38:24 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ vinay.sajip type: enhancement versions: + Python 3.8 |
| 2018-03-27 11:22:48 | madsjensen | create | |