The ZipFile class as a extractall method [0] that allows you to leave the 'members' empty. If empty, the 'members' becomes a list of all the *names* of files in the zip. Then it iterates over the names as sends each to `self._extract_member`. But that method needs it to be a ZipInfo object instead of a file name, so it re-wraps it [2].

Instead we can use `self.infolist()` to avoid that re-wrapping inside each `self._extract_member` call. 


[0] hhttps://github.com/python/cpython/blob/12e7cd8a51956a5ce373aac692ae6366c5f86584/Lib/zipfile.py#L1579
[1] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/12e7cd8a51956a5ce373aac692ae6366c5f86584/Lib/zipfile.py#L1586
[2] https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/12e7cd8a51956a5ce373aac692ae6366c5f86584/Lib/zipfile.py#L1615-L1616

(PS. I'm new to filing Python bugs and submitting patches. I *think* this is the right version. I've only been looking at 'master'.)

There is an obscure behavior change introduced by this PR. Technically a ZIP file can contain several entries with the same name. Currently extractall() will extract the last of them multiple times.  The result doesn't differ from when extract it only once, there is just a waste of time. After merging this PR extractall() will extract different entries to the same location. If one of the is a directory, and other is a file, extractall() will fail.

I'm not sure it can be considered a valid ZIP file, but currently the zipfile module supports it.

On other hand, what is the benefit of using `self.infolist()` instead of `self.namelist()`?