MagicMock allows to check parameters of calls by using "assert_has_calls". However it fails if argument has a mutable type and was changed in-place before the second call.

The example is provided in attached file.

In "func1" value in "data" changes for each iteration and as result:
call_args_list contains two same calls.
In "func2" variable "data" generates by function "get_dict" and in this case call_args_list contains correct values.

Obviously it happens because class _Call (https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.5/Lib/unittest/mock.py#L1929) does not create a deepcopy of call args/kwargs.

Will it be correct to add deep_copy logic in mock.py ? or may be it's wrong to use logic like in "func1"? 
I see only one disadvantage of using deepcopy: it will become slower.

There are several disadvantages to doing deepcopy:

* identity checks now fail
* deep copying is slow
* deep copying doesn't work on arbitrary objects

So deep copying by default isn't a good idea. This particular case is mentioned in the docs, with an example of a deep-copying mock if you need one.