With the fix below is becomes possible to build rpms on the Mac.

The developer will need to install rpm tooling.  That's easy via "brew install rpm".

That, for example, installs /usr/local/bin/rpmbuild.

Sadly bdist_rpm.py only supports rpmbuild in two places, see:

https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/6f0eb93183519024cb360162bdd81b9faec97ba6/Lib/distutils/command/bdist_rpm.py#L313

Which due to the Mac's fastidious security setup we are very strongly discouraged from working around.

So, yeah, let's add a third, like so maybe:

        if ((os.path.exists('/usr/bin/rpmbuild')
             or os.path.exists('/bin/rpmbuild')
             or os.path.exists('/usr/local/bin/rpmbuild'))):
            rpm_cmd = ['rpmbuild']

And now I can use build_rpm on my mac, oh joy.

ping

Rather than searching a few hard-coded paths, I would think this would be a good case for using distutils.spawn find_executable like test_bdist_rpm.py does :)  If someone (@bhyde) were willing to create a PR with that change, this issue will have a much better chance of being resolved.

Thanks, @n0npax, for producing a PR implementing what I suggested.  It looks good.  However, while testing it, I ran across earlier open Issue11122 in which the same issue of building rpms on macOS is brought up. (Sorry I didn't see this earlier!)  The solution proposed there is to just unconditionally use rpmbuild as the use of rpm was for now obsolete versions.  I don't really have any experience with rpmbuild or stake in making the change.  But, rather than applying PR 10589, it looks like following through on Issue11122 would be the better approach.  Therefore, I'm going to close this issue (and PR) as a duplicate and suggest we move the discussion and perhaps generate a new PR there.