When superclass inherits from Generic, attributes set for a subclass are incorrectly propagated to its superclass.

Without Generic attribute access raises an exception:

    class X:
        def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs):
            super().__init_subclass__(**kwargs)
            cls.attr = 42

    class Y(X):
        pass

    Y.attr  # 42
    X.attr  # AttributeError

With Generic it does not:

    import typing

    T = typing.TypeVar('T')

    class X(typing.Generic[T]):
        def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs):
            super().__init_subclass__(**kwargs)
            cls.attr = 42

    class Y(X):
        pass

    Y.attr  # 42
    X.attr  # 42

This issue is more server that I expected: it doesn't just propagate value to superclasses, but overrides them. The last subclass created by Python runtime will overwrite value for the whole chain.

Current workaround is

    class X(typing.Generic[T] if typing.TYPE_CHECKING else object):

Nah, that's a bad one: you cannot use Generic classes as intended by specifying types.

It looks like it happens because cls._grog is not yet set properly by the time __init_subclass__ is called.

That's a better workaround:

    class X(typing.Generic[T]):
        def __init_subclass__(cls, **kwargs):
            super(typing.GenericMeta, cls).__setattr__('_gorg', cls)
            super().__init_subclass__(**kwargs)

FWIW, this is fixed in 3.7 by PEP 560, providing a separate fix for 3.6 is not easy, and you have a good workaround, so I propose to close this issue.

I believe I'm experiencing a related bug in the new (3.7) version unfortunately. The current version of typing.Generic.__init_subclass__ isn't chaining to super(Generic, cls).__init_subclass__, meaning Generic's position in class bases can prevent subsequent bases from working properly. I can currently work around it with this unsightly hack but it's obviously suboptimal:

    _old_generic_init_subclass = object.__getattribute__(ta.Generic, '__init_subclass__').__func__
    @classmethod  # noqa
    def _new_generic_init_subclass(cls, *args, **kwargs):  # noqa
        _old_generic_init_subclass(cls, *args, **kwargs)
        super(ta.Generic, cls).__init_subclass__(*args, **kwargs)
    ta.Generic.__init_subclass__ = _new_generic_init_subclass  # noqa

Thanks Will!

I think this is actually a different (although very similar issue). It looks like it is easy to fix. Could you please open a separate issue (and mention it here)? Also could you please provide a typical example when this breaks so that I can add an appropriate test with the fix?

Done: https://bugs.python.org/issue33207 - thanks for the quick response!