repr() of deeply nested dicts and dictviews can cause a stack overflow.

>>> x = {}
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = {1: x}
... 
>>> repr(x)
Segmentation fault

>>> x = {}
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = {1: x}
... 
>>> repr(x.values())
Segmentation fault

repr() of virtually all other deeply nested collections are guarded by using Py_EnterRecursiveCall().

>>> x = ()
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = (x,)
... 
>>> repr(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of a tuple

>>> x = []
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = [x]
... 
>>> repr(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of a list

>>> x = frozenset()
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = frozenset({x})
... 
>>> repr(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of a list

>>> from collections import OrderedDict
>>> x = {}
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = OrderedDict({1: x})
... 
>>> repr(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of a list

>>> from collections import deque
>>> x = deque()
>>> for i in range(100000):
...     x = deque([x])
... 
>>> repr(x)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while getting the repr of a list

But the case of infinite recursion already is handled:

>>> x = {}
>>> x[1] = x
>>> repr(x)
'{1: {...}}'

Only finite but very deep recursion causes a crash.

The one possible solution -- add Py_EnterRecursiveCall() in the implementation of dict.__repr__(), like it already is added in list.__repr__() and tuple.__repr__().

The more general solution -- add Py_EnterRecursiveCall() in PyObject_Repr(). In any case it is called before calling PyObject_Repr() for every item in the repr of most collections except dict. And it is already added in PyObject_Str(). Therefore adding it will not add much overhead, but can handle more corner cases.

See also issue18533 and issue25240.

New changeset 1fb72d2ad243c965d4432b4e93884064001a2607 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch 'master':
bpo-32137: The repr of deeply nested dict now raises a RecursionError (#4570)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/1fb72d2ad243c965d4432b4e93884064001a2607

PR 4812 is an alternate fix for 3.6. It doesn't touch reprs of other types.

Could you please take a look at PR 4689 and PR 4812 Raymond? I remember you had objections against similar changes and I have small hesitates. What way of solving this issue in maintained releases do you prefer?

New changeset 688b6dec4e8847a154ef27257069291175764794 by Serhiy Storchaka (Miss Islington (bot)) in branch '3.6':
bpo-32137: The repr of deeply nested dict now raises a RecursionError (GH-4570) (GH-4689)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/688b6dec4e8847a154ef27257069291175764794

The issue seems somewhat contrived but the fix looks fine to me.

New changeset b7a2c17be8411bc4c7a2babdc650074c14204aa8 by Serhiy Storchaka in branch '2.7':
[2.7] bpo-32137: The repr of deeply nested dict now raises a RuntimeError (GH-4570) (#5493)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/b7a2c17be8411bc4c7a2babdc650074c14204aa8