The type of PyCell_Type is not available in the types module or anywhere else. Since this type is exposed to users it seems like it's a rather odd omission.

Related issues:
- https://bugs.python.org/issue2408
- https://bugs.python.org/issue1605

According to discussions in the issues referred by you, this omission is intentional. Do you have any new arguments for adding the cell type in the types module?

I have just reread those discussions and I don't see any reasoning behind omitting the cell type. It is barely mentioned.

Basically, I need this type and it isn't exposed anywhere. I don't care where it is, but the only way to get it right now is a hack, for example:

a = [1]
def f(): return a
return type(f.__closure__[0])

The reason is that nobody provided good enough arguments for exposing a cell type in the types module. The initial argument "types should expose all types used by the interpreter" was found to be bad. There are a lot of types (like "stderrprinter" or "list_reverseiterator") that shouldn't be exposed.

Well that's true enough. My main argument is consistency. Cells and code objects together make up closures, so to manipulate closures you need both. Right now I am using a ctypes hack to modify the cells/closures, for what I consider a strategically important use-case. So I guess a type(cell) hack isn't out of place; the risk is it's fragile.

So, to really make hot reloading work with no hacks I need both this and the follow-up of https://bugs.python.org/issue14369 to be implemented. Or equivalently, a python interface to make closures mutable.

Honestly I don't know what your criteria are, so it's hard to make a point.

I think the cell type is pretty fundamental to Python's semantic model. IIRC there once was a time when cells were entirely hidden from the user, but that's no longer true. Third-party code that uses them might want to have type annotations and then it's a pain when there's no way to talk about them. And no, that doesn't mean it belongs in typing.py -- that's not a scalable model, and in general we only want to shadow things there that must be generic (but aren't in types.py), like `List` or `re.Pattern`.