➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2017-09-05 20:44 by barry, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Pull Requests | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| URL | Status | Linked | Edit |
| PR 3355 | merged | barry, 2017-09-05 20:44 | |
| Messages (6) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg301372 - (view) | Author: Barry A. Warsaw (barry) *  |
Date: 2017-09-05 20:44 | |
Placeholder issue for discussion of the design of the implementation of PEP 553. |
|||
| msg302109 - (view) | Author: Dawid Gosławski (alkuzad) | Date: 2017-09-13 19:54 | |
Will that be backported also to Python2.7 ? I personally do not see a reason to teach old dog new tricks but it seems appropriate in such core things. New users could transition easier, otherwise this would be next py2<->py3 difference to explain every time someone uses new code. |
|||
| msg302110 - (view) | Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) * |
Date: 2017-09-13 20:00 | |
It is a new feature, so no it would not be backported. |
|||
| msg303573 - (view) | Author: Barry A. Warsaw (barry) * |
Date: 2017-10-03 00:22 | |
PEP is accepted. PR needs review. |
|||
| msg321306 - (view) | Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * |
Date: 2018-07-09 09:23 | |
Is it needed to specify the fromlist argument for PyImport_ImportModuleLevelObject()? The only effect of this is that Python will try to import the hook as a submodule if it is not an attribute of the parent module. But I think that callable modules is very uncommon case and we should not support is specially. Getting rid of the fromlist argument will simplify the code. |
|||
| msg321337 - (view) | Author: Barry A. Warsaw (barry) * |
Date: 2018-07-09 17:47 | |
It's a convenient API. I think originally I may have just don't effectively a getattr on the imported module, but I don't remember (and don't have original implementation handy - thanks, rebase!) I don't have particularly strong feelings on the matter. If you want to submit a PR, I'll take a look. I suppose technically it *is* a functional change that might not be acceptable now that 3.7.0 is released though. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:58:51 | admin | set | github: 75534 |
| 2018-07-09 17:47:30 | barry | set | messages: + msg321337 |
| 2018-07-09 09:23:15 | serhiy.storchaka | set | nosy:
+ serhiy.storchaka messages: + msg321306 |
| 2017-10-05 16:11:54 | barry | set | status: open -> closed resolution: fixed stage: patch review -> resolved |
| 2017-10-03 05:50:21 | serhiy.storchaka | set | title: Implement PEP 553 - built-in debug() -> Implement PEP 553 - built-in breakpoint() |
| 2017-10-03 00:22:53 | barry | set | messages:
+ msg303573 stage: patch review |
| 2017-09-13 20:00:14 | r.david.murray | set | type: enhancement messages: + msg302110 nosy: + r.david.murray |
| 2017-09-13 19:54:43 | alkuzad | set | nosy:
+ alkuzad messages: + msg302109 |
| 2017-09-06 08:11:29 | ethan smith | set | nosy:
+ ethan smith |
| 2017-09-05 20:44:52 | barry | set | pull_requests: + pull_request3370 |
| 2017-09-05 20:44:20 | barry | create | |