In struct there are several places using code like:

  p[--i] = (char)x;

to extract the least significant byte from a long. Although this behaviour seems to apply to common implementations but it does not conform to C standard.

I think it is better to change the type of p to unsigned char.

> I think it is better to change the type of p to unsigned char.

Good advice.

I meant changing the type of the first argument of np_ubyte() etc.

np_ubyte(unsigned char *p, PyObject *v, const formatdef *f)

Hmm, do we need to? Currently all pack routines accept a char *p. Converting it to unsigned char * inside could also solve the problem.

Your patch LGTM as a minimal patch for backporting to maintained releases (maybe Mark have other comments). But I think it would be better to make all pointers to raw memory of type unsigned char*. Not just packing, but unpacking too. Using even memcpy between long* and char* is undefined behavior, the source and target should either have the same type, or one of them be unsigned char*.

New changeset 981096f98b9c131594b0ac85ad01b63cbd11aa0a by Xiang Zhang in branch 'master':
bpo-30242: resolve some undefined behaviours in struct (#1418)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/981096f98b9c131594b0ac85ad01b63cbd11aa0a

New changeset aad1caf55f7fadb00ee097a1465bece4e128d8ef by Xiang Zhang in branch '3.6':
bpo-30242: resolve some undefined behaviours in struct (#1418) (#1586)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/aad1caf55f7fadb00ee097a1465bece4e128d8ef

New changeset dd2a09cf98845b1460f0e049ad0ffeeb5c6c6476 by Xiang Zhang in branch '3.5':
bpo-30242: resolve some undefined behaviours in struct (#1418) (#1587)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/dd2a09cf98845b1460f0e049ad0ffeeb5c6c6476

New changeset 982a17e02d99dcf6e4dff93110cff5ecc59247f5 by Xiang Zhang in branch '2.7':
bpo-30242: resolve some undefined behaviours in struct (#1418) (#1588)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/982a17e02d99dcf6e4dff93110cff5ecc59247f5