Created on 2008-05-21 13:19 by ncoghlan, last changed 2008-05-21 13:23 by ncoghlan. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg67152 - (view) | Author: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) *  |
Date: 2008-05-21 13:19 | |
The rich compare implementation for set objects raises TypeError directly instead of returning NotImplemented to allow the other type involved in the comparison a chance at handling the operation. |
|||
| msg67153 - (view) | Author: Nick Coghlan (ncoghlan) * |
Date: 2008-05-21 13:23 | |
Eh, never mind, raising the TypeError explicitly is necessary due to the misbehaviour of the default comparisons in 2.x. I'll work around the problem in my test case. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-05-21 13:23:44 | ncoghlan | set | status: open -> closed resolution: not a bug messages: + msg67153 |
| 2008-05-21 13:19:21 | ncoghlan | create | |