After running ./configure on Linux or MacOS X, check the generated pyconfig.h header:

$ grep TZNAME pyconfig.h
/* #undef HAVE_DECL_TZNAME */
/* #undef HAVE_TZNAME */

However, tzname exists and is declared in time.h on Linux and MacOS X as can be seen by compiling and running the following simple program:

$ cat tzname.c
#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>

int main() {
    tzset();
    printf("%s/%s\n", tzname[0], tzname[1]);
}
$ clang tzname.c -o tzname
$ ./tzname
EST/EDT

Note that tzname is mandated by the recent editions of POSIX <http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/tzset.html>, so I am not sure whether we need to check for it in configure.

Looking at the autoconf documentation, HAVE_TZNAME is only set iff struct tm does not have a tm_zone member *and* the external array tzname is found:

https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.64/html_node/Particular-Structures.html

If the struct tm does have a tm_zone member (which it does on Linux), the check for tzname is not even run.

> HAVE_TZNAME is only set iff struct tm does not have a tm_zone member ...

I've figured that much from reading the generated configure script, but thanks for the pointer to the documentation.

If you want to separately check for the definition of tzname,
I guess you have to add a AC_DEFINE() section specifically
for tzname.

The real issue is that when setting the tzname tuple in the time module, we use a guess based on the value of tm_zone probed in June and January.  I am not sure whether this is wise.  Shouldn't we just use C tzname is it is available?

> The real issue is that when setting the tzname tuple in the time module, we use a guess based on the value of tm_zone probed in June and January.  I am not sure whether this is wise.  Shouldn't we just use C tzname is it is available?

I don't think tzname is really all that useful. In mxDateTime,
I use strftime() with "%Z" to obtain the timezone string for
a given local time.

tzname tries to identify non-DST vs. DST of the local time zone,
but this may fail for cases where a country switches DST settings
in a particular year as it happened in Russia:

https://www.timeanddate.com/time/zone/russia/moscow

> I don't think tzname is really all that useful.

I agree. More so after issue 25283 (Make tm_gmtoff and tm_zone available on all platforms).  That's why I don't see why the time module need to set tzname to anything other than what the C library does.

Interestingly, glibc may even change tzname[0] as a side-effect of calling  localtime:

(on Linux)
$ cat lt.c
#include <time.h>
#include <stdio.h>


int main() {
  struct tm tm = {0, 0, 0, 1, 1, -100};
  time_t t;
  t = mktime(&tm);
  localtime(&t);
  printf("%s/%s  %d %d\n", tzname[0], tzname[1], timezone, daylight);
  t = 0;
  localtime(&t);
  printf("%s/%s  %d %d\n", tzname[0], tzname[1], timezone, daylight);
}

$ gcc lt.c -o lt
$ ./lt
LMT/EDT  18000 1
EST/EDT  18000 1

I think that's a bug in glibc because it makes no sense to change tzname[0] while not updating timezone.

The resolution of this [1] glibc bug report effectively says that the use of global variables tzname, timezone and daylight is not supported by glibc unless a POSIX-style TZ setting is used (which is probably never in real world).

[1] https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23859

See also bpo-35385.