https://docs.python.org/3.2/reference/compound_stmts.html#function-definitions 

and onwards say the following

    decorator      ::=  "@" dotted_name ["(" [parameter_list [","]] ")"] NEWLINE

This is a regression from the 2.7 docs, which correctly said

    decorator      ::=  "@" dotted_name ["(" [argument_list [","]] ")"] NEWLINE

The implication is that the following is supposedly valid in python 3:

    @deco(what : "is this" = "supposed to mean")
    def foo(annotations: "are only for here" = "right?"):
        pass

The interpreter disagrees with the docs, and correctly rejects this syntax as garbage

The offending patch can be found at https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/71ff2235bb4c

The parent commit is also bad:

https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b65007ef59c0

New changeset 451dd29ebae3 by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.5':
Backed out changeset 71ff2235bb4c (closes #27042)
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/451dd29ebae3

New changeset d13999a6be8c by Benjamin Peterson in branch '3.5':
class definitions only get argument lists (closes #27042)
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d13999a6be8c

New changeset d384bf58f5f8 by Benjamin Peterson in branch 'default':
merge 3.5 (#27042)
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d384bf58f5f8