1. It doesn't have the Reference 4 used anywhere in the doc.

2. The `if` condition is not properly ended in the Programming Recommendation section.

3. Apart from that few grammatical changes are necessary I believe.

I can't really comment on the grammar changes, but the rest looks good to me.

This is not very smooth, in both versions:

-Consistency within one module or function is most important.
+Consistency within one module or function is the most important thing.
 
-But most importantly: know when to be inconsistent -- sometimes the
-style guide just doesn't apply.  When in doubt, use your best
+But more importantly: know when to be inconsistent -- sometimes the
+style guide just isn't applicable.  When in doubt, use your best

(Consistency is already *most* important, but then comes something *more* important?)

Thanks!  I like some of the changes, and may tweak a few others.  Thanks for the contribution.

New changeset 43d612fc6b12 by Barry Warsaw in branch 'default':
Gramatical and other improvements given by thefourtheye.
https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/43d612fc6b12

-Consistency within one module or function is most important.
+Consistency within one module or function is the most important.

You left out "thing" from the patch; is that intended?

On Feb 22, 2016, at 02:20 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:

>Georg Brandl added the comment:
>
>-Consistency within one module or function is most important.
>+Consistency within one module or function is the most important.
>
>You left out "thing" from the patch; is that intended?

Yes.