This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: Implement free-list for single-digit longs
Type: performance Stage: resolved
Components: Interpreter Core Versions: Python 3.6
process
Status: closed Resolution: duplicate
Dependencies: Superseder: Free list for single-digits ints
View: 24165
Assigned To: yselivanov Nosy List: mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov
Priority: normal Keywords: patch

Created on 2016-02-11 19:22 by yselivanov, last changed 2022-04-11 14:58 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Files
File name Uploaded Description Edit
long_fl.patch yselivanov, 2016-02-11 19:22 review
Messages (3)
msg260124 - (view) Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * (Python committer) Date: 2016-02-11 19:22
The attached patch implements a free-list for single-digit longs.  We already have free lists for many fundamental types, such as floats & unicode.

The patch improves performance in micro-benchmarks by 10-20%.  It'll also lessen memory fragmentation issues.


== Benchmarks ==

### spectral_norm ###
Min: 0.268018 -> 0.245042: 1.09x faster
Avg: 0.289548 -> 0.257861: 1.12x faster
Significant (t=18.82)
Stddev: 0.01004 -> 0.00640: 1.5680x smaller

-m timeit -s "loops=tuple(range(1000))" "for x in loops: x+x"
with patch: 34.5 usec           without patch: 45.9 usec


== Why only single-digit? ==

I've also a patch that implements free-lists for 1-digit, 2-digits and 3-digits longs, and collects statistics on them.  It looks like we only want to optimize 1-digit longs:

* 2to3 benchmark (the first number is the number of all N-digit longs, the second number is the number of longs created via free-list):

===> d1_longs = 142384 124759
===> d2_longs = 6872 6264
===> d3_longs = 2907 2834

* richards:
===> d1_longs = 219630 219033
===> d2_longs = 1455 1096
===> d3_longs = 630 627

* spectral_norm:
===> d1_longs = 133928432 133927838
===> d2_longs = 1471 1113
===> d3_longs = 630 627
msg260125 - (view) Author: Serhiy Storchaka (serhiy.storchaka) * (Python committer) Date: 2016-02-11 19:32
This looks as a duplicate of issue24165.
msg260127 - (view) Author: Yury Selivanov (yselivanov) * (Python committer) Date: 2016-02-11 19:37
You're right Serhiy, closing this one.
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:58:27adminsetgithub: 70529
2016-02-11 20:09:40yselivanovsetstatus: open -> closed
stage: patch review -> resolved
2016-02-11 19:37:31yselivanovsetsuperseder: Free list for single-digits ints
resolution: duplicate
messages: + msg260127
2016-02-11 19:32:03serhiy.storchakasetmessages: + msg260125
2016-02-11 19:22:36yselivanovcreate