When using pdb -m pdb test.py and entering:

(Pdb) b A.f
Breakpoint 1 at d:\tmp\stack\test.py:8
(Pdb) commands 2
(com) disable 2
(com) until 13
(com) end

Until doesn't seem to have any effect. When statement is executed manually, everything works as expected (execution halts before implicit return from function).

test.py is missing.

Adding test.py, but according to docs https://docs.python.org/3.2/library/pdb.html#pdbcommand-commands

"Specifying any command resuming execution (currently continue, step, next, return, jump, quit and their abbreviations) terminates the command list (as if that command was immediately followed by end). "

This is probably expected behavior.

In here:

> /home/vyktor/src/error/minimal.py(1)<module>()
-> print('1')
(Pdb) break 2
Breakpoint 1 at /home/vyktor/src/error/minimal.py:2
(Pdb) commands 1
(com) print('Triggered bp 1')
(com) until 4
(com) end
(Pdb) cont
1
Triggered bp 1
> /home/vyktor/src/error/minimal.py(2)<module>()
-> print('2')
(Pdb) 


until has no effect.

Expected behavior would be executing print 2 and 3.

The bug occurs also on the default branch:
'3.5.0a4+ (default:8bac00eadfda, May  6 2015, 17:40:12) \n[GCC 4.9.2 20150304 (prerelease)]'

The reason is that 'do_until' is missing from the
Pdb.commands_resuming list, which causes the Pdb.bp_commands() method
to invoke the interaction function _cmdloop() after having processed
all the breakpoint commands instead of returning from the trace
function, so that the settings made by set_until() are lost.