➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2008-03-17 18:12 by brett.cannon, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| object_compare.patch | bethard, 2008-03-18 01:06 | |||
| Messages (5) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg63702 - (view) | Author: Brett Cannon (brett.cannon) *  |
Date: 2008-03-17 18:12 | |
When you compare disparate types through something other than == and != a Py3K warning should be raised. |
|||
| msg63734 - (view) | Author: Steven Bethard (bethard) * |
Date: 2008-03-17 19:40 | |
I'll start looking at this. |
|||
| msg63757 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2008-03-17 20:25 | |
Can the be done without making comparisons more expensive across the board. It will be bad news for Py2.6 if every single comparison gets slowed down. |
|||
| msg63834 - (view) | Author: Steven Bethard (bethard) * |
Date: 2008-03-18 01:06 | |
The code is only invoked when NotImplemented is produced. Take a look at the attached patch to try_3way_to_rich_compare and see if you think it's going to be too expensive. |
|||
| msg63947 - (view) | Author: Steven Bethard (bethard) * |
Date: 2008-03-18 17:27 | |
Resolved in revision 61529. |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:56:31 | admin | set | github: 46595 |
| 2008-03-18 17:27:04 | bethard | set | status: open -> closed messages: + msg63947 |
| 2008-03-18 01:06:58 | bethard | set | files:
+ object_compare.patch keywords: + patch messages: + msg63834 |
| 2008-03-17 20:25:55 | rhettinger | set | nosy:
+ rhettinger messages: + msg63757 |
| 2008-03-17 20:15:44 | brett.cannon | set | priority: release blocker -> critical |
| 2008-03-17 19:40:57 | bethard | set | nosy:
+ bethard messages: + msg63734 |
| 2008-03-17 18:12:54 | brett.cannon | create | |