Creating an environment with pyvenv or "python -m venv" in 3.4+ can be a bit disconcerting, as it may take some time (especially on older machines).

It would be good if the command line utility displayed some kind of marking while this operation was in progress.

(The delay seems to be mostly due to ensurepip - running "./python -m venv --without-pip" under my 3.4 checkout is relatively fast, at least on my system)

Should this be a change to ensurepip, then, or a change in pyvenv? My original pyvenvex.py script at

https://gist.github.com/vsajip/4673395

shows progress information as the subprocess runs. However, it somewhat depends on the verbosity of the underlying child process to relay meaningful progress.

I'm not actually sure - it only occurred to me while filing the issue that ensurepip was the likely culprit.

Donald, what do you think? Is virtualenv chattier here?

virtualenv is definitely chattier - it prints out the path where the env will be and when it is installing setuptools and pip.

That's all that's really needed here too, IMHO - just enough to let users know that venv has heard them and is doing something (not just waiting for Python to start up).

It looks as if ensurepip is where changes should happen. The venv code just makes a subprocess.check_output() call to ensurepip, and anything that ensurepip outputs would be displayed on the console.

I just noticed this issue. I think all that really needs done here is changing the venv module to use subprocess.check_call instead of subprocess.check_output when calling ensurepip.

I have a vague recollection of originally using check_call, and then switching to check_output. However, that may have just been for testing related reasons, which could be better handled in the test suite, allowing users to see the pip installation output as a progress indicator.

If we add the extra output, adding a -q/--quiet option at the same time would be a good idea.

Can we close this? I guess this enhancement is no longer needed.

I close the issue.

If someone wants to work on venv, I suggest to attempt to copy virtualenv cache optimization of virtualenv 20, to speedup the creation of a venv, rather than adding a progress bar :-)