➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2014-02-22 20:34 by elazar, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg211950 - (view) | Author: Elazar Gershuni (elazar) * | Date: 2014-02-22 20:34 | |
typo - should be "itertools-functions" instead of "itertool-functions" http://docs.python.org/3.4/library/itertools.html#itertool-functions |
|||
| msg211962 - (view) | Author: R. David Murray (r.david.murray) *  |
Date: 2014-02-22 21:51 | |
I'm not sure there's a problem here. Calling the section "Itertool Functions" is a matter of choice of English phrasing. And given that the section is called that, the label is parallel to it (and in any case is an internal matter). |
|||
| msg211963 - (view) | Author: Elazar Gershuni (elazar) * | Date: 2014-02-22 22:14 | |
"itertools" is not English, but the name of the Python library. So it is not plural, and not a matter of choice of English phrasing. In addition, as a section name, it should be "Functions" with a capital F, just like "Itertools Recipes" down there. http://docs.python.org/3.4/library/itertools.html#itertools-recipes |
|||
| msg212100 - (view) | Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2014-02-24 14:14 | |
Elazar, this is a nit and isn't worth changing the section head (that would break any external links to the section). Also, I like the way it reads now (itertools functions is technically correct but sounds odd to my ear). |
|||
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-04-11 14:57:59 | admin | set | github: 64932 |
| 2014-02-24 14:14:20 | rhettinger | set | status: open -> closed nosy: + rhettinger messages: + msg212100 resolution: wont fix |
| 2014-02-22 22:14:00 | elazar | set | messages: + msg211963 |
| 2014-02-22 21:51:06 | r.david.murray | set | nosy:
+ r.david.murray messages: + msg211962 |
| 2014-02-22 20:34:58 | elazar | create | |