I will add as a disclaimer to this bug report that I am relatively new to both the http spec, and Python programming, so I may have completely misunderstood something.

When I make a post request with some data (using libCurl), It sends the headers first, including one header, "Expect: 100-continue" and then waits for around a second, or until receiving a "100 Continue" response, before sending the rest of the data. (I have attached WireShark capture data as html to show this, I've also attached a dump showing how Apache behaves given the same request). 

This means that when I make such a request to a CGI script, hosted using CGIHTTPServer, and the script tries to read in the data, (for instance, using cgi.FieldStorage() ). Then the CGI script takes around a second to parse the data, since it hasn't been sent yet.

I currently have a work-around for this, which is to override CGIHTTPRequestHandler, and have it send a "100 Continue" response before doing anything else. A dump showing this is attached, this makes the connection much faster. This is fine for my application, as all CGI requests will be made in the same way, However it is not a general solution. 

The W3C, when defining Expect Headers, state (taken from http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html);

A server that does not understand or is unable to comply with any of the expectation values in the Expect field of a request MUST respond with appropriate error status. The server MUST respond with a 417 (Expectation Failed) status if any of the expectations cannot be met or, if there are other problems with the request, some other 4xx status. 


I would like to offer to implement handling of the Expect header in BaseHTTPServer, however I would like some feedback before doing this, and to check that the current behaviour is not intended for some reason.

This change would make CGIHTTPServer much faster in my use case, and I suspect it would help other people.

See also issue 1346874.  It seems that we do not currently handle 'continue' correctly in general.

Issue1346874 seems similar, but is talking about a failure to handle 100 Continue responses sent by a server to the client, this issue is in server code, and is a failure of BaseHttpServer to send 100 Continue responses to a client which expects them.

Please tell me if I'm mistaken/not making sense.

You are making perfect sense.  My point in referencing that issue was that you are not crazy, we do indeed not handle continue correctly ;)

Cheers, would you suggest I submit a patch then?

Also what version of python should I do this against? I've been working with 2.7, but the issue still exists in 3.* and I can conveniently work against 3.2.3-7, and less conveniently work against other versions.

I think we can fix this in maintenance releases without breaking anyone's code, so a patch against both 2.7 and 3.3 would be ideal.  A patch against 3.2 will probably apply cleanly to 3.3, so that should be fine as well.

Thanks for working on this, and could you please submit a contributor agreement at your earliest convenience?  It takes a few days for that to get processed.

Have downloaded an up to date version of Python to develop with, and found that this issue had been fixed in it. This seems to have been done in changeset:   65028:7add45bcc9c6

changeset:   65028:7add45bcc9c6
user:        Senthil Kumaran <orsenthil@gmail.com>
date:        Thu Sep 30 06:09:18 2010 +0000
summary:     Issue1491 - BaseHTTPServer incorrectly implements response code 100

This change does not seem to appear in 2.7 , and could be converted to work with this, however failing this, this issue can probably be closed.

I appologise for not spotting this earlier.

Sorry, this change does appear in 2.7.* I was looking at the wrong mercurial Tag

No need to apologize for missing the issue.  I missed it too, and I was looking for it because I thought I remembered something...but only found the one I referenced and assumed that that was what I was remembering.