The PEP 3132 said:
"""
... if seq is a slicable sequence, all the following assignments are equivalent if seq has at least three elements:

a, b, c = seq[0], seq[1:-1], seq[-1]
a, *b, c = seq
[a, *b, c] = seq
"""

But this doesn't happen for byte strings:

>>> seq = b'xyz'
>>> a, b, c = seq[0], seq[1:-1], seq[-1]
>>> a, b, c
(120, b'y', 122)
>>> a, *b, c = seq
>>> a, b, c
(120, [121], 122)

Tested on Python3.3 and Python3.2 (Linux Ubuntu 11.04)

New changeset a0077c1d201d by Georg Brandl in branch 'default':
Closes #16916: clarify "slicing equivalent to extended unpacking" example: the latter always creates a list.
http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/a0077c1d201d

Thanks for the report. This statement was actually false for almost all sequence types, except for those whose slicing returns a list.