This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

classification
Title: xml.etree.ElementTree.Element: append method iterator param is broken
Type: behavior Stage: resolved
Components: macOS, XML Versions: Python 2.7
process
Status: closed Resolution: not a bug
Dependencies: Superseder:
Assigned To: nobody Nosy List: eli.bendersky, ezio.melotti, kirpit, nobody, ronaldoussoren
Priority: normal Keywords:

Created on 2012-09-25 12:06 by kirpit, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin. This issue is now closed.

Messages (5)
msg171255 - (view) Author: (kirpit) Date: 2012-09-25 12:06
xml.etree.ElementTree.Element's append method doesn't support iterator/sequence parameters as it's supposed to, for the version 1.3.0.

Python 2.7.3 (default, Sep 14 2012, 09:52:31) 
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang 4.0 ((tags/Apple/clang-421.0.60))] on darwin
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import xml.etree.ElementTree as et
>>> et.VERSION
'1.3.0'
>>> root = et.Element('root')
>>> sublist = [et.Element('sub'), et.Element('sub')]
>>> root.append(sublist)
>>> et.tostring(root)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 1127, in tostring
    ElementTree(element).write(file, encoding, method=method)
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 818, in write
    self._root, encoding, default_namespace
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 878, in _namespaces
    for elem in iterate():
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 477, in iter
    for e in e.iter(tag):
AttributeError: 'list' object has no attribute 'iter'

>>> root = et.Element('root')
>>> root.append(iter(sublist))
>>> et.tostring(root)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 1127, in tostring
    ElementTree(element).write(file, encoding, method=method)
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 818, in write
    self._root, encoding, default_namespace
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 878, in _namespaces
    for elem in iterate():
  File "/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/xml/etree/ElementTree.py", line 477, in iter
    for e in e.iter(tag):
AttributeError: 'listiterator' object has no attribute 'iter'
msg171256 - (view) Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-09-25 12:13
(unassigning as this is not a mac-specific issue)

BTW. Is this really a bug, the documentation says that append appends a single element <http://docs.python.org/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html#xml.etree.ElementTree.Element.append>:

<quote>
append(subelement)
Adds the element subelement to the end of this elements internal list of subelements.
</quote>
msg171260 - (view) Author: (kirpit) Date: 2012-09-25 12:44
well, i've just followed the source code regardless to documentation so you may be right about appending a single element. (kind of newbie around here.)

but then, append method is misbehaving about asserting the parameter, isn't it?
msg171261 - (view) Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-09-25 12:51
Use the extend method to add multiple elements. Both the source and documentation indicate that 'append' is used for appending a single item and 'extend' for appending multiple items (just like with list).

IMHO this is not a bug.

As an aside: when you import xml.etree.cElementTree you get a faster implementation of the same interface, and this (C-based) implementation does validate arguments.
msg172880 - (view) Author: Eli Bendersky (eli.bendersky) * (Python committer) Date: 2012-10-14 13:09
Closing, since this isn't a bug and append's behavior is properly documented.

Regarding the error message, yes it could probably be better but you would need to enable input validation for that. Since Python is duck typed, often when arguments are not validated you get less-than-good error messages if things go wrong. In this case, append expect something Element-like that would have an "iter" method, and complains when that's not found.

In 3.3 this whole thing was improved by always validating arguments in append/extend etc. and raising a TypeError when something is wrong. I don't think there's good enough reason to change this in 2.7
History
Date User Action Args
2022-04-11 14:57:36adminsetgithub: 60248
2012-10-14 13:09:02eli.benderskysetstatus: open -> closed

messages: + msg172880
stage: resolved
2012-09-26 13:11:38ezio.melottisetnosy: + ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky
2012-09-25 12:51:06ronaldoussorensetresolution: not a bug
messages: + msg171261
2012-09-25 12:44:08kirpitsetmessages: + msg171260
2012-09-25 12:13:17ronaldoussorensetassignee: ronaldoussoren -> nobody

messages: + msg171256
nosy: + nobody
2012-09-25 12:06:04kirpitcreate