A couple of months back I started a page on the wiki for a topical index of PEPs from PEP 0 [1].  I got tired of reading through PEPs trying to see if one related to what I was working on.  I found myself wishing there was a topical index of all the PEPs.  The wiki page is the result.

Since it is relatively more dynamic an index than those in PEP 0, I figured it wouldn't work to add it there.  However, I had gotten some support for adding a link to that wiki page to PEP 0, so here's a patch that does so.

I was not sure that the URL should be in the intro, so the patch puts it in its own section right above the Index by Category.

The structure of the wiki page is satisfactory, I hope, and I was able to populate a handful of topics I could think of.  I did not get to very many of the standards-track PEPs.  Still, I think it's a good start and worth linking to in PEP 0.

[1] http://wiki.python.org/moin/Topically_Organized_PEP_List

Hm, why not be more ambitious and include your grouping directly in the PEP repository?  You should ask python-dev how they like your wiki page, and then we’ll see if it can be generated from a category or keyword in the PEPs themselves.

P.S. about the version field: this bug is not relevant to the release of 3.3.0.

I had considered that, but thought it would be better to leave the topical index open for editing to a broader audience.  If it's in PEP 0 then only committers could make changes.

I do like the idea of using keywords from the PEPs themselves, but that would again preclude anyone but committers from defining the topics.

I brought up the index on the core-mentorship list in April and got a favorable response from Guido and Nick.

Nick: "Indeed, a very good idea.  The wiki is probably a good place for it (since it will need to be manually maintained, and there's no reason to restrict that privilege to core devs)" and a link in PEP 0 to the wiki page would be easy to do.

Hi Eric!  Are you still interested in this?  I notice that the wiki page hasn’t been updated, and it’s also kind of a dry list with no interactivity (search, sort, jump to section, hyperlinks to PEPs).  Are you still interested?  If yes, do you still think that it is more accessible to edits on the wiki rather than in the PEPs repo (which can get PRs)?