From: Martin v. Löwis <email@example.com>
Sent: Tue, 21 September, 2010 16:53:27
Subject: [issue678250] test_mmap failling on AIX
Martin v. Löwis <firstname.lastname@example.org
> added the comment:
> Interestingly, the matter was discussed on another issue, #2643. I
> also agree that ideally flush() should become a no-op (only in 3.2,
> since it would break compatibility). But then we should also expose a
> separate sync() method with the current behaviour.
I think you misunderstand. I'm not proposing that flush should become
a noop entirely - only for ACCESS_COPY mappings.
Python tracker <email@example.com